Understanding the procedure of the Small Claims Court is the first half of the battle. The second, and equally important, half is knowing how to build a winning case. This guide moves from the procedural "how-to" to the practical "what-to-do," offering a playbook for the most common types of disputes seen in the Small Claims Court.
Introduction: Turning Theory into Practice
Success in this forum is rarely about complex legal arguments; it is about presenting clear facts supported by strong, credible evidence. This section will break down three frequent scenarios—unreturned rental deposits, faulty goods, and unpaid personal loans—and provide a clear strategy for each.
Case Study 1: The Unreturned Rental Deposit
The Scenario
A tenant moves out of a property, having left it in good condition, but the landlord refuses to refund the security deposit, claiming it is needed for repairs. This is one of the most common disputes between individuals and is frequently heard in the SCC.
The Law
The primary legislation governing this issue is the Rental Housing Act 50 of 1999. This Act sets out clear rules for landlords:
- The deposit must be held in an interest-bearing account for the duration of the lease, and the tenant is entitled to the accrued interest.
- The Act specifies strict timelines for the refund:
- Within 7 days of the lease terminating if there are no deductions for damages.
- Within 14 days of restoration of the property if there are deductions for repairs.
- In all cases, the balance of the deposit must be refunded within 21 days of the lease termination.
Your Argument
The tenant's case typically rests on one of two key arguments:
Argument 1: Unlawful Deductions
The landlord is deducting for issues that constitute normal "wear and tear" (e.g., faded paint, worn carpets), which is not permitted. Deductions are only lawful for actual damages caused by the tenant beyond this.
Argument 2: Procedural Failure
The landlord forfeited their right to claim from the deposit because they failed to conduct a joint entry and/or exit inspection with the tenant. The Rental Housing Act makes these inspections a prerequisite for making deductions.
Essential Evidence (Your Arsenal)
A well-prepared tenant should compile the following evidence:
The Lease Agreement
This is the core contract outlining the terms of the tenancy.
Proof of Deposit Payment
A bank statement or receipt showing the deposit was paid.
Entry and Exit Inspection Reports
These documents are the most powerful evidence. A detailed, signed entry inspection report noting the property's initial condition, when compared with the exit report, can decisively prove or disprove a landlord's claims of damage. The absence of these reports is a major point in the tenant's favour.
Photographs and Videos
Date-stamped photos or videos taken at the start and end of the lease are invaluable visual proof of the property's condition.
Written Communication
A complete record of all emails, text messages, and WhatsApp conversations with the landlord regarding the property, maintenance issues, and the deposit refund.
Receipts
Any receipts for professional cleaning or minor repairs the tenant undertook before vacating the property.
Alternative Option: It is important to note that while the Small Claims Court is a valid option, tenants also have access to the Rental Housing Tribunal (RHT). The RHT is a specialized, free service designed to mediate and adjudicate these exact disputes. While its rulings may not be as easily enforced as a court order, it is often a highly effective first port of call before resorting to the SCC.
Case Study 2: Faulty Goods & Bad Service
The Scenario
A consumer buys an item—a cellphone, a washing machine, a piece of furniture—and it proves to be defective shortly after purchase. The supplier refuses to provide a satisfactory remedy, offering only a repair voucher or blaming the consumer.
The Law
The consumer's primary protection is the Consumer Protection Act (CPA) 68 of 2008. The CPA provides consumers with an implied 6-month warranty of quality on all goods (Section 56). This warranty means that goods must be:
- Reasonably suitable for the purpose for which they are intended.
- Of good quality, in good working order, and free of defects.
- Durable and usable for a reasonable period.
Know Your Rights
If goods fail to meet these standards within six months of purchase, the consumer has the right to return them and choose one of the "3 Rs": a Repair, a Replacement, or a full Refund. The choice belongs to the consumer, not the supplier.
Your Argument
The case is built on the foundation of the CPA. The argument is that the goods were not of acceptable quality or were defective, this defect became apparent within the 6-month warranty period, and therefore the consumer is entitled to their chosen remedy (e.g., a full cash refund). The supplier cannot legally force a consumer to accept a repair if they are demanding a refund for a faulty product within this period.
Essential Evidence (Your Arsenal)
- Proof of Purchase: The original till slip, invoice, or a bank statement showing the transaction is non-negotiable.
- The Faulty Item: If practical, the defective product should be brought to court to be inspected by the Commissioner.
- Photographs and Videos: Clear visual evidence demonstrating the defect (e.g., a video of the appliance failing to switch on, a photo of a crack in the furniture) is highly persuasive.
- Record of Communication: A log of all calls, emails, and store visits, including the names of staff spoken to and their responses. A copy of the Letter of Demand is also essential.
- Expert Assessment: A report or quote from an independent technician or repair person explaining the nature of the defect can serve as powerful expert evidence to counter a supplier's claims.
Case Study 3: Unpaid Personal Loans or "Bad Debt"
The Scenario
An individual lends money to a friend, family member, or acquaintance based on a verbal promise of repayment. The borrower subsequently fails or refuses to pay the money back.
The Law
A common misconception is that an agreement must be in writing to be legally binding. In South Africa, a verbal contract is valid and enforceable. The law requires only three elements for a valid contract: an offer (e.g., "Can you lend me R5,000?"), acceptance (e.g., "Yes, I can"), and consideration (the act of one party giving the money and the other receiving it).
Your Argument
The argument in court is straightforward and factual. The claimant needs to prove to the Commissioner, on a balance of probabilities, that:
- A loan agreement existed between the parties.
- The claimant fulfilled their part of the agreement by advancing the money to the defendant.
- The defendant has breached the agreement by failing to repay the loan as promised.
Essential Evidence (Your Arsenal)
Since there is no formal written contract, the case is built on circumstantial and corroborating evidence:
Documentary Evidence
- Informal Written Agreement: Any form of written communication can serve as evidence of the agreement. This includes WhatsApp messages, SMS texts, or emails where the loan was discussed (e.g., "Thanks for agreeing to lend me the money," or "When can I expect the R5k?").
- Proof of Transfer: A bank statement showing the electronic funds transfer from the claimant's account to the defendant's account is undeniable proof that money was advanced.
- Record of Repayment Requests: A log of all subsequent communications (texts, call logs, emails) where the claimant asks for the money back and the defendant's responses (or lack thereof).
Testimonial Evidence
- Witnesses: If another person was present during the conversation when the loan was agreed upon, their testimony can be used to corroborate the claimant's version of events.
Quick Reference Summary
| Dispute Type | Key Evidence to Collect | Main Legal Point to Argue |
|---|---|---|
| Unreturned Rental Deposit | Lease, proof of payment, entry/exit reports, date-stamped photos, written communication. | Landlord made unlawful deductions (e.g., for wear and tear) OR failed to follow the Rental Housing Act procedures (e.g., no joint inspections). |
| Faulty Goods | Proof of purchase, the faulty item, photos/videos of the defect, communication with supplier. | The goods are defective, and under the CPA's 6-month implied warranty, the consumer is entitled to their choice of a repair, replacement, or refund. |
| Unpaid Loan | Any written agreement (even texts/emails), proof of money transfer, records of repayment requests, witnesses. | A valid loan agreement existed (even if verbal), the money was paid to the defendant, and the defendant has failed to repay the debt as agreed. |
Conclusion: Be Prepared, Be Confident
While every case is unique, these common disputes share a unifying principle: success in the Small Claims Court is achieved through meticulous preparation and credible evidence. The Commissioner is there to ascertain the facts, and the party who presents the clearest, most well-supported version of events is the most likely to succeed.
By understanding the relevant laws and gathering the right evidence, any individual can approach the court with the confidence that they are well-equipped to present their case effectively and secure a just outcome.
Ready to Take Action?
Now that you understand how to build a winning case, it's time to put this knowledge into practice. Start gathering your evidence today!
Start Your Claim →